When Are Interest Rates Too Low?

The ECB is expected to cut overnight rates 10 bps to -0.5% and extend their QE bond buying program at this week’s meeting. Outgoing leader Mario “Whatever it Takes Bazooka” Draghi is being replaced by Christine “Whatever it Takes TBD” Lagarde next month. The debate over the most effective policy tools to stimulate economic growth will dominate the market narrative in between tweets from @RealDonaldTrump against the @FederalReserve and Jerome Powell’s lack of commitment to easing policy. With Germany’s trade dependent economy, the backbone of the EU breaking hard under the global trade war, the ECB cannot afford a stronger euro, which would only hurt manufacturing. We can expect a Bazooka like effort from Draghi this week (Sept 12 7:45 am).


The leadership for low rates started in Japan about 20 years ago and moved into Europe under the Bazooka of Mario Draghi in the now infamous July 2012 “Whatever it Takes” speech. But Greenspan launched his first Bazooka in 2001 following the busting of the tech bubble and accelerated by the devastation of 9-11. We’ve been in a global battle for weaker currencies and low rates for two decades, so this is nothing new. But it’s now taking centre stage because after 20 years of actual results, we can see that its efficacy is waning.

The Bank of Canada (BoC) has been a bit of an anomaly amongst central banks. Canada got lucky in 2008/09 as surging oil prices in the first half of the recession was a huge benefit for Canadian trade and the Canadian economy was not hit nearly as hard so we did not have to cut rates to zero and as oil recovered, we were able to raise rates faster than most. Recall that it helped to push the C$ to a premium over the US$ in 2007 and again in 2011 as oil prices again moved above $100 before the US fracking revolution sent supply through the roof. So energy prices do matter from the Canadian perspective more than most countries, though the US is now the largest oil producer in the world. High oil prices for most economies are a tax on consumption and a contributor to a weaker consumer. In Canada, we have the same consumer impact, but the pluses generally outweigh the minuses (except when your government does not support the industry). Last week the BoC was not as dovish as some hoped and if you believe the employment data (which is highly questionable), the BoC may not match US rate cuts going forward. The battle is all RELATIVE!

China added stimulus last week by way of an adjustment to reserve requirements allowing banks to lend more, as DJT so eloquently reminded Jerome Powell in a midnight tweet storm. Low rates and economic stimulus by way of deficits will be even more in focus as we head into the US 2020 election, but also in Europe and Japan to stimulate growth.

An article in the influential Barron’s magazine this week suggested that CBs should be raising rates and governments should be running massive deficits to boost growth. Low rates are toxic for bank profits and could lead to a far worse problem for insurance companies and pensions funds. All of which we’ve talked about for years here on Berman’s Call. A few week’s ago, Germany issued a 30 year bond at a negative rate. That tells you that people expect prices to fall for 30 years because today’s euros are worth more than future euros. Why else would you pay the government to hold your money for you for 30 years?

If these guys cannot see the problem with where rates are going and advocate for more of the same, you RETIREMENT funds are at risk of underperforming you life expectancy. It’s a major is and the topic of my Fall 2019 BNN Roadshow called Fixing Fixed Income – The elusive quest for A Real Return.

If you’re NOT a millennial, you might remember the good old days where you could earn 6-8% with very little risk, simply buying bonds. If you have greyer than Larry does, you’ll remember the bad old days of double-digit inflation and 15% bond yields in the 1970s. The great financial crisis ushered in a new era of massive debt and ultra-low rates. Now as far as the eye can see, fixed income is “broken” because, in real terms, rates are somewhere between zero and negative. Should you just forget about this asset class entirely? Is higher risk investing the new normal? Will inflation come back? Will Modern Monetary Theory and popularist politics turn the financial world on its head? Will we all be forced to pay banks to keep our cash safe in the near future? Join Larry for an overview of how to understand fixed income, how it has historically played a role in portfolios, and how/why we’ve arrived at the current paradigm.

It’s not all bears and bond bubbles however. As usual, we’ll be showcasing portfolio techniques for thriving in the times we’re in, and what may be around the next corner. We’ll look at liquid alternatives, convertible bonds, options strategies and currency strategies as a source of yield, high yield without the high risk, and long/short tactics for navigating the forgotten world of fixed income. Larry will bring it all together for you in a portfolio context with ideas on how to use ETFs along with less correlated investment instruments (like gold) to put these ideas into action.

Click here to register for free and as always we ask for volunteer donations to one of our two favourite charities. Children’s cancer research at the Sick Kids Hospital and Alzheimer’s and dementia research at the Baycrest Hospital.

 

One thought on “When Are Interest Rates Too Low?”

  1. Avatar
    Joe Polito says:

    Of course they are too low now. Our politician’s election promise should be to stop ignoring four Nobel Prize winners and an engineering genius!
    Thomas Edison, 100 years ago, explained that our money system needed to be re-engineered. He lived through the Civil War, Lincoln’s Greenbacks and many depressions. He asked why a Federal government which can issue debt free coins and banknotes, would issue bonds requiring extra taxes to pay private bank interest?
    Edison knew the debt-based money machine must change, as did many titans of Economics including Nobel Prize winners James Tobin, Maurice Allais, James Buchanan and Milton Friedman.
    A debate-based money system is why we have record personal debt, substantial corporate and public debt and potential negative interest rates. Friedman explained in “A Monetary and Fiscal Framework for Economic Stability”: eliminate the private creation of money, and fund government shortfalls with central bank loans, not private bank loans. miltonfriedman.hoover.org/friedman_images/Collections/2016c21/AEA-AER_06_01_1948.pdf

    This 5 minute presentation by Professor Keen is very consistent with Friedman
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=287Cu5me0Og

    The money used to save the banks was not debt issued – 60 Minutes segment with Bernanke when the Central Bank funded saving the banks.

Share your thoughts and comments