PRO-EYES

Last Update: February 07, 2025
Jump to section: Valuation | Business Cycle Factor | Tactical Factor
America First policies may dominate trading in the first half of 2025, but that does not change the overbought nature of the market or the higher valuation risk factors. Long duration US bonds (8 year maturity or more) had negative total returns again in 2024 and for the fourth year in a row for TLT. We have suggested that government bonds are broken as the protection in your portfolios since BREXIT. GOVT is the US government ETF. Since BREXIT, it has returned an annualized return of 30 bps (after MER) with inflation averaging about 2%. This will be a bit better going forward as yields have risen, but not much if inflation is sticky as we are starting to see. If there is a hard landing, TLT should deliver 20% plus returns from current levels.
VALUATION
Risk Level: 97%
Forward based EPS expectations do not seem to line up with the economic realities of the day. Correction risks are elevated.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA
A reading near or at 100% means the EV-to-EBITDA is the most expensive it has ever been. The average returns over the coming years will likely be well below average. While the market is expensive historically, this metric suggests returns will be well below average and should not be used as a timing indicator, but adds to the cautionary valuation environment. Enterprise value, is the sum of debt and equity capital a company uses less cash like holdings on the balance sheet compared to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. In other words, how much capital is used to generate free cash flow. |
![]() |
Price-to-Sales
A reading near or at 100% historically means the average returns over the coming years will likely be well below average. While the market is expensive historically, this metric suggests returns will be well below average and should not be used as a timing indicator, but adds to the cautionary environment. The revenue a company generates is less subject to manipulation (financialization) like earnings per share can be and can be a better valuation metric than comparisons to earnings. Many industries have higher margins, so price-to-sales is not a perfect guide. |
![]() |
Forward P/E
A reading near or at 100% historically means the average returns over the coming years will likely be well below average. While the market is extremely expensive historically, this metric suggests returns will be well below average and should not be used as a timing indicator, but adds to the cautionary environment. Earnings expectations are a key factor for market growth. Analysts are often too optimistic on forward expectations. Forward P/Es historically are 2 multiple points below trailing average. The historic average P/E for US large caps is about 16.5x earnings. |
![]() |
Equity Risk Premium
A reading of 100% historically means the average returns over the coming years will likely be well below average. While the market is expensive historically, this metric suggests returns will be well below average and should not be used as a timing indicator, but adds to the cautionary environment. The equity risk premium is the discount factor investors are paying for stocks above the risk free rate. The inverse of the P/E called the earnings yield plus the long-term government yield is a reasonable estimate. Overall, the ERP increased 3.0bps last week. The yield of the 30-year bond declined 9.4bps. The earnings yield of the S&P 500 declined 6.4bps. The tightening of financial conditions is likely to continue in the short run. But we are very close to fully pricing in the terminal rate of Fed funds and weakening of the economy and earnings should start to balance out. Markets remain on the expensive side, but it’s mostly because of higher rates. |
![]() |
BUSINESS CYCLE FACTOR
Risk Level: 97%
A reading of 100% historically means the average returns over the coming years will likely be well below average. While the market is expensive historically, this metric suggests returns will be well below average and should not be used as a timing indicator, but adds to the cautionary environment. The equity risk premium is the discount factor investors are paying for stocks above the risk free rate. The inverse of the P/E called the earnings yield plus the long-term government yield is a reasonable estimate. Overall, the ERP increased 3.0bps last week. The yield of the 30-year bond declined 9.4bps. The earnings yield of the S&P 500 declined 6.4bps. The tightening of financial conditions is likely to continue in the short run. But we are very close to fully pricing in the terminal rate of Fed funds and weakening of the economy and earnings should start to balance out. Markets remain on the expensive side, but it’s mostly because of higher rates.
Slope of Yield Curve
A reading near 70% suggests the yield curve (3-months vs. 10-years) is somewhat flatter than the historical average. A normal sloped yield curve is healthy and is a positive business cycle factor. A curve getting flatter over time suggests financial conditions are tightening. The recent trend has been steeper. Last week, the 3M-10Y curve was 8.8bps flatter. The 12-Month forward expectation for SOFR is 3.96% which is pricing in 40bps of rate cuts. Over the past week, rates changed by -5bps and by -17bps over the past month. |
![]() |
High Yield vs. Investment Grade Credit Spreads
At a reading near 90%, credit spreads are near extreme low levels and suggest very easy financial conditions and a goldilocks outlook ahead. Investors are not adequatly compensated for credit risks looking forward when a shock develops, but this is never a moment in time, but a process over weeks or months. Wide credit spreads correlate with high business cycle risk. If we start to see equities falter with bad economic news, it’s a sign that credit risks are very high. The yield-to-worst (maturity) for junk bonds is 7.25%, which is -0.4 standard deviations below average. The FOMC and other central banks are reducing liquidity and e expect them to maintain tighter financial conditions than equity markets are pricing for an extended period. Looking out, we should expect tighter financial conditions and wider credit spreads until the economy troughs. Over the past month, HY-IG spreads are -6bps narrower. Over the past 3 months, HY-IG spreads are -8bps narrower. Momentum is increasing. |
![]() |
NY Fed Weekly Leading Indicators
Over the past week, the NY Fed weekly leading economic index slowed. The trend over the past month is slowing at a faster pace. The recent trend suggests evidence of weaker growth. Growth challenges are significant without deficit driven stimulus. For more details see: https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/policy/weekly-economic-index#/interactive We are now past the stimulative phase of the cycle and looking ahead, quantitative tightening (QT) will likely provide a major headwind for risk premiums. The labour market remains the stickiest part of the core inflation push with real assets showing signs of deflation. |
![]() |
Real Yields & Inflation Expectations
Over the past week, real 10-Year Treasury yields declined -5.8bps. Nominal yields decreased -4.4bps, while long-term inflation expectations rose 1.4bps to 2.56%. Real monetary policy is restrictive relative to long-term expectations. Short-term inflation numbers remain extremely elevated, while longer-term market based inflation expectations are elevated relative to the range of the past decade. Based on recent curve moves, the market has likely priced in more tightening than the FOMC actually will need to do given increasing odds of a recession. |
![]() |
TACTICAL FACTOR
Risk Level: 57%
Markets rallied in January and now bearish seasonal for February are aligned with Tariff Man in DC. We likely see key support levels tested before we can continue to rally.
5-Day Put/Call Ratio Risk Level: 89% The Put/Call ratio measures a degree of speculation and hedging in the options markets. A reading above 90% suggests an extreme degree of bullish speculation. Last week, the average put volume declined 1,745 contracts per day while the average call volume declined 3,694 contracts per day. ![]() |
Speculative Position S&P 500 Futures Risk Level: 88% Positions of long only speculators in the S&P 500 futures contracts offers a potential future source of supply or demand. Current readings are extremely elevated and suggests a high risk of stop loss selling. As of February 4, S&P 500 E-mini long only speculators reduced their net long position last week by 1,898.0 million dollars. This group of long-only asset managers are as long as they have been since November 2021. ![]() |
Percentage Deviation from 200-Day Moving Average Risk Level: 65% Deviation from trend is close to neutral levels. The market rises above longer-term trends more than 2/3rds of the time. The 50-day average is above the 200-day average with the trend of the 50-day average rising and the trend of the 200-day average rising over the past week. ![]() |
AAII Bull vs. Bear Sentiment Spread Risk Level: 21% When the percentage of Bulls is well below the percentage of Bears, there is plenty of pent up demand and cash to buy. Last week the percentage of bulls decreased -7.7% while the percentage of bears increased 8.9%. Sentiment in the past month is less bearish than average. The 1-month average reading is 41% compared to the 3-month average reading of 53%. ![]() |
Seasonal Pattern (All Years) Since 1928 Risk Level: 69% The 1-Month forward based return is below average based on the 4-year presidential cycle model. Seasonal patterns thus far in 2024 have been meaningfully off trend. We do not expect seasonal trends to matter too much this year. Clearly, we are facing a unique US election period. ![]() |
Presidential Cycle (Current Year) Since 1928 Risk Level: 88% Positions of long only speculators in the S&P 500 futures contracts offers a potential future source of supply or demand. Current readings are extremely elevated and suggests a high risk of stop loss selling. As of February 4, S&P 500 E-mini long only speculators reduced their net long position last week by 1,898.0 million dollars. This group of long-only asset managers are as long as they have been since November 2021. ![]() |
Current vs. Average Volatility (VIX) Risk Level: 65% Deviation from trend is close to neutral levels. The market rises above longer-term trends more than 2/3rds of the time. The 50-day average is above the 200-day average with the trend of the 50-day average rising and the trend of the 200-day average rising over the past week. ![]() |
Current vs. Future Volatility (VIX) Risk Level: 34% Last week, current volatility was -0.1% below the previous week. Future volatility was 0.1% above the previous week. The ratio of current volatility to future volatility is now close to inverted. Volatility readings are swinging with the latest headlines. We expect elevated volatility readings as long as geopolitical risks are high. ![]() |
Percentage of S&P 500 Holdings Above 50-Day Average Risk Level: 37% The percentage of stocks in the S&P 500 above their own 50-Day averages is 51.1%, which is 0.4% below the previous week. It is 8.3% above the average of the past month. Tactically, not weak enough for a buy signal. Shorter-term breadth in the past month is weaker than average. The 1-month average reading is 43% compared to the 3-month average reading of 47%. ![]() |
Percentage of S&P 500 Holdings Above 200-Day Average Risk Level: 43% The percentage of stocks in the S&P 500 above their own 200-Day averages is 59.6%, which is 2.8% below the previous week. It is 0.3% above the average of the past month. Longer-term breadth in the past month is weaker than average. The 1-month average reading is 59% compared to the 3-month average reading of 64%. ![]() |
Breadth-McClellan Summation Index Risk Level: 41% The breadth of the market is somewhat weak. Fewer stocks are participating in the advance. The McClellan Summation Index Breadth Oscillator over the past month is weaker than average. The 1-month average reading is 776 compared to the 3-month average reading of 1109. ![]() |
Overbought-Oversold 13-Week Relative Strength Index Risk Level: 57% The 13-week RSI is modestly elevated at 59. Overall, RSI has much higher signal efficacy at extremes and better at bottoms than tops. When interpreting the RSI, we are typically looking for divergences. Currently, there is no strong evidence of divergence. ![]() |